Move from “the AI said so” to a record people can review.
Groundnote keeps structured meeting outcomes connected to transcript evidence, confidence states, and supporting files.
Trace outcomes to source
Reviewers can see the speaker and timestamp associated with an extracted decision, task, or risk and return to the supporting transcript context.
Decision: Delay the release until the security review is complete.
Evidence: A linked quote from the release meeting, with speaker and timestamp, plus a “Confirmed” verification state after review.
Add supporting material
The evidence library can attach documents, images, recordings, and other files to the meeting. Audit records capture relevant evidence operations and approval changes.
Evidence supports review; it does not guarantee that an AI extraction is correct. Consequential outcomes should still be checked by a person.
Evidence-linked meeting notes FAQs
What are evidence-linked meeting notes?
They are meeting records where extracted decisions, tasks, and risks retain a link to supporting transcript quotes, speakers, timestamps, or attached files.
Does evidence mean an AI result is automatically correct?
No. Evidence makes a claim reviewable. Groundnote also uses confidence and verification states so a person can confirm, dispute, edit, or reject an extracted outcome.
Can files be attached as supporting evidence?
Yes. Groundnote includes an evidence library for attaching documents, images, audio, video, and other files to a meeting record.